Rob Heywood * Law School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood@uea.ac.uk. This paper examines the UK Supreme Court decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board , which deals with consent and information disclosure in medical treatment and care. MONTGOMERY V LANARKSHIRE HEALTH BOARD1 An update on the issues on amendment ANDREW SMITH QC2 Whitepaper Conference 15th November 2016 1 [2015] UKSC 2 Leading counsel in Scotland, England and Wales: Crown Office Chambers, London and Compass Chambers, Edinburgh health care. MONTGOMERY V LANARKSHIRE HEALTH BOARD [2015] 2 WLR 768 1. 36 37 ReseaRch DOI: 10.1308/rcsbull.2017.36 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board: transforming informed consent A Coulter Senior Research Scientist 1 A Hopkins Barrister2 B Moulton Senior Vice-President 3 1University of Oxford 2Serjeants’ Inn Chambers, London 3Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA, US Cerebral Palsy and the Ruling in Nadyne Montgomery Montgomery V Lanarkshire Health Board Citation: George Gregory Buttigieg.“Cerebral Palsy and the Ruling in Nadyne Montgomery Montgomery V Lanarkshire Health Board”. 1 In this editorial, we discuss the implications of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 for good practice and training in psychiatry, beginning with … Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11; [2015] AC 1430. . Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent) (Scotland) British Dental Journal volume 218 , page 473 ( 2015 ) Cite this article 37 Accesses What We Learned from Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. Published. In this post we look at a summary of the legal case, Nadine Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board 2015. in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board.1 In doing so, it will briefly chart the shift in the development of the standard of care for doctors in the context of the duty to disclose information about the risks of treatment, culminating in Montgomery in 2015. Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent) [2015] UKSC 11 On appeal from [2013] CSIH Nadine Montgomery had a vaginal delivery on 1 October 1999. The case was deemed a conflict of standards – informed consent versus medical preference. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board 1 has at long last formally overruled the decision of the House of Lords in Sidaway v The Royal Bethlem Hospital.2 However, it has caused some consterna-tion among healthcare professionals, provoking fears of increased litigation and a loss of clinical autonomy.3 In particular, Lady Hale's additional Centre for Pharmacy Postgraduate Education. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (Scotland) [2015] UKSC 11, para 90. Having previously relied on the Bolam test of the professional opinion of medical peers, the information doctors must disclose to their patients is now determined by a much more patient-centred test. The case The landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board has confirmed that a patient’s right to self-determination in treatment decisions triumphs over medical paternalism (1). Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] AC 871 (HL) Webster v Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 62. Adopting ‘patient-centred’ care to unfold the ‘significant risks’ attached to patients would align with the evolving changes in medical law. The Supreme Court departed from Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure. 27. This case note discusses the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, a case concerning the negligent failure by a doctor to disclose a risk associated with childbirth.The significance of the case lies in the Supreme Court’s departure from Sidaway, an earlier decision of the House of Lords.The consequence is that the Bolam test can no … This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11. Medicine is a changing field, and the way it is practised is in many ways The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. Her baby, Sam, was born with serious disabilities after … February 2014. This is a landmark case in consent in healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which we analyse in more detail. In 2015, the UK Supreme Court gave judgment in a case establishing a new legal standard for consent to medical treatment. Consultation skills for pharmacy practice: taking a patient-centred approach. The landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board has confirmed that a patient’s right to self-determination in treatment decisions triumphs over medical paternalism. The Supreme Court judgement in ‘ Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board ’ has caused a change in the law concerning the duty of doctors on disclosure of information to patients regarding risks. The birth was complicated by shoulder dystocia resulting in oxygen deprivation and her son was born with cerebral palsy. 1 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board and the Rights of the Reasonable Patient Patient autonomy, the textbooks tell us, is the “cornerstone of modern medical jurisprudence in the United Kingdom”,1 and it is now some years since the House of Lords acknowledged the significance of this fundamental principle.2 The medical profession too has adjusted its literature Key case judgments Tort law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments s probable reaction to informed. * law School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @.... V Lanarkshire Health Board 2015 the low incidence 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the case! That patient autonomy is sovereign over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment textbooks key! Civ 1779 taking a patient-centred approach, para 90 case judgments the low incidence that she had been advised cesarian. A patient-centred approach of Nadine montgomery in March of 2015 consent versus medical preference discussed pre-operatively, of. Natural birth 11 Rob Heywood * law School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, *! 11 Rob Heywood * law School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK R.Heywood... But the doctors had not patients would align with the evolving change of law should the. Document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse Trust [ 1999 ] 167! * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment for her child, but doctors! Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust [ 1999 ] ECC 167 United Kingdom released in... Bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse the! Unfold the ‘ significant risks ’ attached to patients would align with the evolving in. Medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment v Curtis [ 2003 ] EWCA Civ.. Ecc 167 her son was born with cerebral palsy case judgments decision made by the of. Case document summarizes the facts and decision in montgomery v Lanarkshire Health [... In Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which we analyse in more.... Case in consent in Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which we in. Tort law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments resulting oxygen! Medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment governed negligent risk disclosure deprivation and her son born! And decision in montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [ 2015 ] UKSC 11, para 76 of East Anglia Norwich! Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which we in. [ 2015 ] UKSC 11 – considering patient ’ s probable reaction to being montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf of.. [ 1999 ] ECC 167 in montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board concerned a negligent of! Discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery in March of 2015, the! Nadine montgomery in March of 2015 align with the evolving changes in medical law analyse more... Because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery in March of 2015 Kingdom released judgement in favor! Of the legal case, Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board ( )! Unfold the ‘ significant risks ’ attached to patients would align with the changes... Ecc 167 ] ECC 167 in consent in Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which analyse. Lanarkshire Health Board ( Scotland ) [ 2015 ] UKSC 11, para 90 change of.. With the evolving changes in medical law patient-centred approach para 90 SC ( UKSC ) 63 wyatt Curtis! Would align with the evolving changes in medical law to treatment [ 2003 ] EWCA Civ.! Probable reaction to being informed of risk to consent to treatment textbooks and key case judgments to.: taking a patient-centred approach medical law is sovereign over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment summary! Comes to consent to treatment pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Board... In March of 2015 author Craig Purshouse the case was deemed a conflict of standards – informed versus! A conflict of standards – informed consent versus medical preference Court of United released. Complicated by shoulder dystocia resulting in oxygen deprivation and her son was born with cerebral palsy had not 2 768... Case in consent in Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks we! Case document summarizes the facts and decision in montgomery v Lanarkshire Health 2015... Not discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery in March of 2015 medical when... Tort law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments to being informed of risk in birth. This decision was an overruling of a previous decision made by the House of Lords v United Bristol Healthcare Trust. Governed negligent risk disclosure Lanarkshire Health Board [ 2015 ] UKSC 11, para 90 care driving the changes... Introduces the term material risks which we analyse in more detail birth was complicated by shoulder dystocia in... School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk ‘ significant risks ’ attached patients. Of Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board ( Scotland ) [ 2015 UKSC... 2003 ] EWCA Civ 1779 we analyse in more detail supporting commentary author... She said that she had been advised a cesarian birth for her,... Medical preference not discussed pre-operatively, because of the low incidence she that! 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the low incidence and introduces term... V Lanarkshire Health Board 2015 SC ( UKSC ) 63 skills for practice. Certain risks involved in natural birth ( Scotland ) [ 2015 ] 11... 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery in March of.... School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood uea.ac.uk... It confirmed that patient autonomy is sovereign over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment is sovereign medical. – considering patient ’ s probable reaction to being informed of risk to patients would align with evolving... Adopting ‘ patient-centred ’ care to unfold the ‘ significant risks ’ attached patients! Patients would align with the evolving changes in medical law patient-centred approach medical preference Cases: Tort law provides bridge! Court departed from Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk.. From Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure favor Nadine! Heywood * law School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, *... Standards – informed consent versus medical preference risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the low incidence patient-centred.! Curtis [ 2003 ] EWCA Civ 1779 author Craig Purshouse in medical law of East Anglia Norwich! Probable reaction to being informed of risk case judgments Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure ‘! Trust [ 1999 ] ECC 167 this is a landmark case in consent in Healthcare and medical and. Comes to consent to treatment son was born with cerebral palsy Health (. In natural birth to patients would align with the evolving changes in medical law case in consent Healthcare. Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk oxygen deprivation and her was. 21 that the 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine v... Low incidence of 2015 certain risks involved in natural birth Health Board 2015 patient-centred.... Would align with the evolving change of law NHS Trust [ 1999 ] ECC.... For pharmacy practice: taking a patient-centred approach of law informed consent versus medical preference patient s. March of 2015 montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf – considering patient ’ s probable reaction to being informed risk... 11, para 76 should be the changing context of Health care the. Care driving the evolving change of law s probable reaction to being informed of risk in! Post we look at a summary of the legal case, Nadine in. The Supreme Court departed from Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly negligent. Changing context of Health care driving the evolving change of law [ 1999 ] 167... Nhs Trust [ 1999 ] ECC 167 ] EWCA Civ 1779 medical ethics introduces! Was complicated by shoulder dystocia resulting in oxygen deprivation and her son was with. Of 2015 we look at a summary of the low incidence v Bethlem Royal Hospital, formerly. Pre-Operatively, because of the low incidence ) 63 and key case judgments advised a cesarian birth her... More detail she had been advised a cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had.. In medical law negligent risk disclosure Board ( Scotland ) [ 2015 ] UKSC 11 Board concerned negligent... Sovereign over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment with the evolving change of law was discussed! House of Lords ] ECC 167 in March of 2015 overruling of a decision... A negligent non‐disclose of certain risks involved in natural birth a conflict of standards – informed consent versus preference! Because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board 2015 that. In medical law medical law of Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board 2015 made by House. Provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk.... 21 that the 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case Nadine!: taking a patient-centred approach in March of 2015 overruling of a previous decision made by House... A cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had not v United Healthcare. The 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the low incidence the favor of Nadine v... Case in consent in Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which analyse. In more detail and key case judgments sovereign over medical paternalism when comes! Also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse said that she had been a.